Down to my last few from an original release 2010 box. These cigars were good fresh and have gotten even better with the little bit of age on them. Construction of the cigars have all been top notch, both in boxes from overseas as well as from IEPT. Like others I am not a fan of hsa getting rid of old favorites in order to produce 'jawbreakers' or über hard to find regionals or Ed LEDs.....but there is a place IMO for these in any smokers line up.
What I like about these smokes is the same thing I have been finding during my recent exploration of domestic cigars. No draw issues on ANY of the 75 or so that I have smoked. The bunch in all of the visible feet have looked similar and are neither under or overfilled. All of the cigars through the multiple boxes have the same taste profile. All have looked visually appealing.
Sure these aren't pepper bombs. Or change that much while you smoke them down. But they do provide a pleasing amount of smoke with cedar and a bit of spice when exhaled through the nose. I believe that when the blender has more filler to work with a more balanced and consistant flavor can be achieved...more room for blender error. Also with these bigger ring gauges there is less chance of getting tent pegs or uneven burns. Obviously there is more secco and less ligero in this wide Churchill then say a RYJ Churchill, which makes it a mild to medium cigar. It's not like your smoking paper you can still tell its a cuban cigar for sure.
After smoking this cigar I understand, or at least think I do lol, where HSA is heading with these bigger ring gauge smokes.
Mikes
RYJ wide Churchill
-
thebigk
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:05 pm
Re: RYJ wide Churchill
I have one that was a gift from last year (sep12) I have been thinking lighting up after this I think it will be tonight
-
Firebender
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:58 pm
Re: RYJ wide Churchill
just got 5er from thegipper TUO OCT12.
I'd love to light one up soon..
I'd love to light one up soon..
-
Habanos
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 4:26 pm
Re: RYJ wide Churchill
Wondering how these compare to the RyJ Short Churchill which I have been enjoying...more of the same or a different flavor profile?
-
fire
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:56 pm
Re: RYJ wide Churchill
I would say more of the same just wider
-
burnem
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:42 pm
Re: RYJ wide Churchill
Of course to each his own, but this was my least favorite Cuban cigar I ever smoked. I remember it being bland and boring and i pitched it somewhere around the middle. Could have gotten a bad one but these comments are the first positive notes I've heard regarding this stick.
-
pabloj671
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 1:05 pm
Re: RYJ wide Churchill
^^^this
these were just flavorless and alot like smoking paper... didnt like these either... i have the rest of my box taking a nap till next year, and they've been down since last year... i shoulda known better tho... took a chance on a new vitola without having heard anything first... i like the Short Churchills and THESE ARE NOT THE SAME
these were just flavorless and alot like smoking paper... didnt like these either... i have the rest of my box taking a nap till next year, and they've been down since last year... i shoulda known better tho... took a chance on a new vitola without having heard anything first... i like the Short Churchills and THESE ARE NOT THE SAME