Tatuaje's have replaced OpusX ....

As stated in the title, a place to discuss cigars and things related to them.
themoneycollector
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 11:18 pm

Re: Tatuaje's have replaced OpusX ....

Post by themoneycollector »

Tats are great, but I don't think they'll ever trump Opus
Mirrorlure7m
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 4:42 pm

Re: Tatuaje's have replaced OpusX ....

Post by Mirrorlure7m »

If I had to choose between a Opus X or Tatuaje I would take the Tatuaje no dout. But with that being said If I had to choose from a Forbidden X or Tatuaje I would take the Forbidden X . I have alot of respect for Pete Johnson with his marketing skills and also just how young he is. I can see Pete being one of the most known cigars with in 10 years. I hope it is sooner because he deserves it.
Diesel
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:29 pm

Re: Tatuaje's have replaced OpusX ....

Post by Diesel »

I think it is safe to say that Pete has arrived in the world of cigars. They are both fantastic smokes, Tatuaje and Opus X. I like them both, more or less at different times. I think it is safe to say when your cigars are being compared to Opus X in terms of popularity, you are doing something right.
Bury me in a spanish cedar casket.
jasdav16
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:59 am

Re: Tatuaje's have replaced OpusX ....

Post by jasdav16 »

[quote author=Diesel link=topic=1378.msg14791#msg14791 date=1244737147]
I think it is safe to say that Pete has arrived in the world of cigars. They are both fantastic smokes, Tatuaje and Opus X. I like them both, more or less at different times. I think it is safe to say when your cigars are being compared to Opus X in terms of popularity, you are doing something right.
[/quote]

Good point!
jarrad
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:56 pm

Re: Tatuaje's have replaced OpusX ....

Post by jarrad »

I don't believe that Tatuaje's will ever replace Opus X as far as rare and limited availability goes.  I used to smoke Opus X all the time.  I still have some B&M's that change my card and send me full boxes from time to time but I no longer seek out Opus X.  I enjoy Cubans and Tats too much.
Azoetia
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:34 pm

Re: Tatuaje's have replaced OpusX ....

Post by Azoetia »

Even though Opus X cigars haven't been as consistent as they used to be, I still prefer them (well, certain vitolas) over Tats.  I do like a few Tats (although I actually like his Cabaiguan Guapos and La Riqueza lines better), and, as has been previously mentioned, either cigar may be the "right" one depending on the circumstance.  
Paragon
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:46 am

Re: Tatuaje's have replaced OpusX ....

Post by Paragon »

After the demand I saw for the 9+ boxes I ran across this shipment, I would have to disagree.
jb
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 2:47 am

Re: Tatuaje's have replaced OpusX ....

Post by jb »

I see the point but I guess Tats aren't quite there yet.  This month I have been in two brick and mortars with the Opus behind the counter.  You had to ask for them.  All the Tats I've ever seen were on the shelves.
Sin
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:58 am

Re: Tatuaje's have replaced OpusX ....

Post by Sin »

Both are great but I think I am more leaning towards the Tats. I just havent had a bad one excluding their AM and White line. With Tatuaje, i know what i'm getting.
Post Reply