Padron Cigars

JxBr · Post by **JxBr** » Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:20 pm

[quote author=insight link=topic=76.msg1564#msg1564 date=1176507576]
Marco, I actually had a buddy hook me up with a couple of aged PANs to see the difference from freshies and I was really quite impressed. I don't like the natties fresh at all but with a couple of years on them they are a whole different animal.
[/quote]

A 2001 1926 PAN #1 is headed your way. Enjoy!!

niterider56 · Post by **niterider56** » Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:43 pm

Tried the 80th at the Big Smoke last Nov., it was very good. I don't know if it was $40-50 good. I actually prefer the regular line maduros(londres, panatella, 6000) except for 64' superior maduros.

riddl85707 · Post by **riddl85707** » Sun Apr 22, 2007 2:12 am

Is 40-50 dollars what they are supposed to cost? I hope not, because I'm not sure there is a smoke worth that much.

atomross13 · Post by **atomross13** » Sun Apr 22, 2007 2:15 am

for $40-50 it had better come with the virgin whos thigh it was rolled on. :bigup:

Large · Post by **Large** » Sun Apr 22, 2007 5:04 am

I just finished a1926 maduro #9 one of my favs. :bigup:

hdlr · Post by **hdlr** » Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:58 am

Love the 64 Pams, especially the Torps and Exclusivos. Not a big fan of the 26's.

FlyFish · Post by **FlyFish** » Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:34 pm

Can't beat an aged londres or 3000 for a pricepoint homerun IMO.

insight · Post by **insight** » Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:43 pm

Had a maduro millenium the other night followed by a 1926 #35. The millenium was better :rotf:

Onlinehumidor.com

Padron Cigars

Re: Padron Cigars

Re: Padron Cigars

Re: Padron Cigars

Re: Padron Cigars

Re: Padron Cigars

Re: Padron Cigars

Re: Padron Cigars

Re: Padron Cigars