Never, ever thought I'd write that one...
[url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2917164/PIERS-MORGAN-American-Sniper-hero-not-coward-did-job-job-kill-people.html][color=blue]Snipers are not cowards[/color][/url]
Obviously in response to the comments from the worthless tub of suet Michale Moore.
Piers Morgan is spot on....
-
Myfirstandlastname
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:20 am
Re: Piers Morgan is spot on....
Michael Moore is a creosote filled bag of gas
-
CasualGentleman
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 9:02 pm
Re: Piers Morgan is spot on....
Yeah not too often I'd say I agree with Piers Morgan. He's a bigger paper gangster that anyone trolling these forums.
-
Pole Lock
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:58 pm
Re: Piers Morgan is spot on....
No he didn't start the war, but was just doing his job... like the Nazis were crying at Nuremberg.
I quote:
[b]He described killing as ‘fun’, admitted ‘I wish I’d killed more’, and said of Iraqis: ‘I hate the damn savages.’[/b]
Sounds like a Nazi to me. Or a 16th century Catholic friar.
I quote:
[b]He described killing as ‘fun’, admitted ‘I wish I’d killed more’, and said of Iraqis: ‘I hate the damn savages.’[/b]
Sounds like a Nazi to me. Or a 16th century Catholic friar.
-
Cohim
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 3:04 pm
Re: Piers Morgan is spot on....
I cannot stop watching myfirstandlastname's picture thingy. It is as hypnotic as Tapps picture thing.
I come from the land of "Show your tit's, and that ain't no lie!!!
-
WadeFillingame
- Posts: 1530
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:14 am
Re: Piers Morgan is spot on....
[quote author=Pole Lock link=topic=31780.msg135415#msg135415 date=1421806647]
No he didn't start the war, but was just doing his job... like the Nazis were crying at Nuremberg.
I quote:
[b]He described killing as ‘fun’, admitted ‘I wish I’d killed more’, and said of Iraqis: ‘I hate the damn savages.’[/b]
Sounds like a Nazi to me. Or a 16th century Catholic friar.
[/quote]
Really stinky bait, but...why do people always go for the Nazi thing, really?
You really need to read some history. I'd suggest something a bit more in-depth than wikipedia. You also need to look at who was on trial at Nuremberg.
It in itself could be considered a crime. It was generally panned as a kangaroo court including by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the US. Of the four charges against the main defendants only one had anything to do with the holocaust, but this isn't about Nuremberg.
Your argument is so flawed as to be nonsense. To compare the actions of a sailor or soldier on the field of battle to Nazi war crimes is ludicrous, but to reach into the Nazis and Nuremberg, seriously? If you understood Nuremberg you'd be referring to the leaders of the coalition. Then even giving you the broadest benefit of the doubt you're still completely out to lunch, you can't even put something like Abu Ghraib in the same category as Treblinka or Dachau.
Clue here -> Service members killing on the field of battle vs rounding up people and executing them.
Want to talk war crimes, lets talk about savages beheading non-combatants.
No he didn't start the war, but was just doing his job... like the Nazis were crying at Nuremberg.
I quote:
[b]He described killing as ‘fun’, admitted ‘I wish I’d killed more’, and said of Iraqis: ‘I hate the damn savages.’[/b]
Sounds like a Nazi to me. Or a 16th century Catholic friar.
[/quote]
Really stinky bait, but...why do people always go for the Nazi thing, really?
You really need to read some history. I'd suggest something a bit more in-depth than wikipedia. You also need to look at who was on trial at Nuremberg.
It in itself could be considered a crime. It was generally panned as a kangaroo court including by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the US. Of the four charges against the main defendants only one had anything to do with the holocaust, but this isn't about Nuremberg.
Your argument is so flawed as to be nonsense. To compare the actions of a sailor or soldier on the field of battle to Nazi war crimes is ludicrous, but to reach into the Nazis and Nuremberg, seriously? If you understood Nuremberg you'd be referring to the leaders of the coalition. Then even giving you the broadest benefit of the doubt you're still completely out to lunch, you can't even put something like Abu Ghraib in the same category as Treblinka or Dachau.
Clue here -> Service members killing on the field of battle vs rounding up people and executing them.
Want to talk war crimes, lets talk about savages beheading non-combatants.
-
Cohim
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 3:04 pm
Re: Piers Morgan is spot on....
I would gear up, and square out any day they would let me. Been there, done that. :bigup:
I come from the land of "Show your tit's, and that ain't no lie!!!
-
Pole Lock
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:58 pm
Re: Piers Morgan is spot on....
I only thought "Nazi" when I read the reasoning behind what, to me, sounded psychopathic and sociopathic. To take joy in killing is different than the "just doing my job" argument.
"America can do no wrong abroad" hubris is depressing.
"America can do no wrong abroad" hubris is depressing.
-
Marker
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Piers Morgan is spot on....
One of the deadliest snipers in history was once asked what he felt when he killed his targets.
His response:
'The recoil'
His response:
'The recoil'