How about the logic in that that is the Admin for the site saying it can't and won't be deleted. Oh of course nevermind you still haven't edited your original post.
So logically which is worse the post that dissapears after 30 days or the permanent one when both out a source?
Way to out a Source Havana John
-
parshooter
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:46 pm
Re: Way to out a Source Havana John
[quote author=kydsid link=topic=13072.msg67938#msg67938 date=1331237107]
How about the logic in that that is the Admin for the site saying it can't and won't be deleted. Oh of course nevermind you still haven't edited your original post.
So logically which is worse the post that dissapears after 30 days or the permanent one when both out a source?
[/quote]
If a source being named is such a major infraction, then it should be deleted by admin. Otherwise, admin is going against it's own rules saying sources shouldn't be named.
How about the logic in that that is the Admin for the site saying it can't and won't be deleted. Oh of course nevermind you still haven't edited your original post.
So logically which is worse the post that dissapears after 30 days or the permanent one when both out a source?
[/quote]
If a source being named is such a major infraction, then it should be deleted by admin. Otherwise, admin is going against it's own rules saying sources shouldn't be named.
-
chilibean
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:52 am
Re: Way to out a Source Havana John
[quote author=kydsid link=topic=13072.msg67938#msg67938 date=1331237107]
How about the logic in that that is the Admin for the site saying it can't and won't be deleted. Oh of course nevermind you still haven't edited your original post.
So logically which is worse the post that dissapears after 30 days or the permanent one when both out a source?
[/quote]
Numbnuts you cannot edit a post after a certain amount of time, but who care's about reality
How about the logic in that that is the Admin for the site saying it can't and won't be deleted. Oh of course nevermind you still haven't edited your original post.
So logically which is worse the post that dissapears after 30 days or the permanent one when both out a source?
[/quote]
Numbnuts you cannot edit a post after a certain amount of time, but who care's about reality
-
SeeGars
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:37 pm
Re: Way to out a Source Havana John
Chilibean = dumbazz
imo
imo
-
BklynNYCigarLover
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:07 pm
Re: Way to out a Source Havana John
[quote author=SeeGars link=topic=13072.msg67945#msg67945 date=1331244014]
Chilibean = dumbazz
imo
[/quote]
More like in everyone's opinion
Chilibean = dumbazz
imo
[/quote]
More like in everyone's opinion
-
WadeFillingame
- Posts: 1530
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:14 am
Re: Way to out a Source Havana John
[quote author=parshooter link=topic=13072.msg67919#msg67919 date=1331225283]
Can't posts/content be deleated or edited by admin ?
[/quote]
Yes, but why would you deliberately post something that you wanted me to delete? and how many times has it been quoted? The simplest thing for me to do is to delete the whole thread, which I really don't like to do in this room.
Calling someone out for listing a source is fine; however, if one is really concerned about a source being outed a PM to the OP suggesting that it is a bad idea is a better idea. Telling them to "Pull your head out of your ass" and quoting a thread that only a few people saw, that will be deleted in 30 days or so and listing said source it a flame in the BZ that will surely be seen by 3x as many people demonstrates many things; none of them are wisdom, intelligence or genuine concern for what was originally posted.
Can't posts/content be deleated or edited by admin ?
[/quote]
Yes, but why would you deliberately post something that you wanted me to delete? and how many times has it been quoted? The simplest thing for me to do is to delete the whole thread, which I really don't like to do in this room.
Calling someone out for listing a source is fine; however, if one is really concerned about a source being outed a PM to the OP suggesting that it is a bad idea is a better idea. Telling them to "Pull your head out of your ass" and quoting a thread that only a few people saw, that will be deleted in 30 days or so and listing said source it a flame in the BZ that will surely be seen by 3x as many people demonstrates many things; none of them are wisdom, intelligence or genuine concern for what was originally posted.